Luke Skywalker
Super Moderator
{vb:raw ozzmodz_postquote}:
The U.S. Capitol Dome is seen under repair on Capitol Hill on Nov. 22, 2015.(Photo: Alex Brandon, AP)
WASHINGTON – Congressional districts around the country will be redrawn about five years from now,<span style="color: Red;">*</span>and it doesn’t look good for Democrats.
The party<span style="color: Red;">*</span>faces long odds in its quest to reclaim control of the House, where the Tea Party wave of 2010 put Republicans firmly in charge.
The GOP's 58-seat majority in the chamber won't shrink much and<span style="color: Red;">*</span>could easily<span style="color: Red;">*</span>expand, analysts say. That's because of projected<span style="color: Red;">*</span>population shifts to mostly red states in the<span style="color: Red;">*</span>South and West, and Republican dominance of state legislatures, which draw congressional maps in most states.<span style="color: Red;">*</span>Any Democratic resurgence will almost certainly take a generation, even under best-case scenarios for the party.
USA TODAY
Supreme Court to rule on race-based congressional maps
USA TODAY
Dwindling number of House members in 'crossover' seats
“The 2010 elections were the most important mid-term elections of our generation,” said David Wasserman, who analyzes House races for the nonpartisan Cook Political Report. “Republicans not only were able to lock in their congressional gains but of course they won so many state legislative (chambers) that they could very well perpetuate their majorities beyond 2020.”
Since 2008, the Democratic Party has lost 69 House seats, 13 Senate seats, more than 900 state legislative seats, 30 state legislative chambers<span style="color: Red;">*</span>and 11 governorships. Last week’s victory by Democrat John Bel Edwards over GOP Sen. David Vitter<span style="color: Red;">*</span>in the Louisiana gubernatorial race was a rare Republican loss in Dixie.
Of the 7,383 state lawmakers<span style="color: Red;">*</span>across the country, 3,172 —<span style="color: Red;">*</span>or 43% — are Democrats. Democrats hold only<span style="color: Red;">*</span>30 of<span style="color: Red;">*</span>the 99 state legislative chambers (Nebraska has a unicameral chamber), and only one of those 30 (the Kentucky House of Representatives) is in the South.
When they control redistricting, Democrats have traditionally created “coalition districts” that tend to include a variety of different liberal groups —<span style="color: Red;">*</span>blacks, Hispanics, progressive whites — sprinkled with independents and Republicans to form Democratic-leaning seats, according to Kimball Brace,<span style="color: Red;">*</span>president of Virginia-based Election Data Services.
He said Republicans have taken the opposite tack, drawing districts that tend to lump together voters with similar demographic backgrounds. That approach has created deep-red districts and very blue ones, winnowing<span style="color: Red;">*</span>the ranks of moderate lawmakers on Capitol Hill.
“What you see<span style="color: Red;">*</span>now is a much more polarizing constituency where you get the Freedom Caucus,” Brace said, referring to the group of hard-line conservatives that helped send former speaker John Boehner packing. “Democrats are never going to take back the House this decade because of that kind of line-drawing.”
USA TODAY
House Freedom Caucus fights for regular order: Column
Election Data Services, which has consulted with numerous states on redistricting,<span style="color: Red;">*</span>projects that House delegations in<span style="color: Red;">*</span>17 states will either grow or shrink<span style="color: Red;">*</span>when congressional seats are reapportioned in 2020 for the 2022 election cycle.
Eight states — Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, North Carolina, Oregon, Texas and Virginia — are expected to gain at least one seat. Nine states — Alabama, Illinois, Michigan, Minnesota, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island and West Virginia — are expected to lose a seat.
Of those 17 states, seven are controlled by Republicans, three are controlled by Democrats, and seven have divided state governments,<span style="color: Red;">*</span>though that could change by the time lines are redrawn.
It seems obvious that Republicans would benefit by gaining congressional seats in states where they<span style="color: Red;">*</span>control redistricting. But they could benefit even if they lose seats, simply by drawing new lines that force Democratic incumbents to run against each other.
Democrats acknowledge their challenge is systemic and might take more than an election cycle or two to fix.
A task force assembled by the Democratic National Committee last week issued a “Victory Action Plan” with recommendations designed to rebuild party strength. Among the recommendations: "values-based” messaging, recruiting the next generation of Democratic candidates from a cross-section of backgrounds, and working with state parties on redistricting strategies.
“While the party has successfully grown and improved its ability to support candidates at all levels of government, recent election cycles make it clear that the DNC must do more to ensure that its success at the national level is reverberating more strongly down the electoral ballot,” the task force report said.
Kentucky governor-elect Matt Bevin answers a question during a press conference in the state Capitol on Nov. 6, 2015, in Frankfort, Ky.<span style="color: Red;">*</span>(Photo: AP Photo, Timothy D. Easley)
The task force was led by Kentucky Gov. Steve Beshear, who is being replaced next month by Tea Party Republican Matt Bevin, another sign of the challenges facing Democrats in the South.
There are glimmers<span style="color: Red;">*</span>of hope for the party.
Florida, for example,<span style="color: Red;">*</span>must redraw its congressional lines to comply with a voter-approved constitutional amendment requiring that districts be drawn fairly. The proposed map, now under review by the state Supreme Court, is projected to give Democrats a net gain of one seat. (Republicans now control 17 of the state's 27 U.S.<span style="color: Red;">*</span>House<span style="color: Red;">*</span>seats).
In addition, more states are exploring the example of California, Arizona and New Jersey, which leave it up to independent commissions to draw congressional lines. Seven states — Alaska, Delaware, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Vermont and<span style="color: Red;">*</span>Wyoming — don't redistrict because each state has only one at-large<span style="color: Red;">*</span>House member.
Democrats could pick up a congressional<span style="color: Red;">*</span>seat here or there over the coming years. And their prospects could grow significantly in 2018 if voters elect a Republican president<span style="color: Red;">*</span>next<span style="color: Red;">*</span>year who turns out to be unpopular, Wasserman said.
USA TODAY
Court faults redistricting plan that 'packed' black voters
But it may not really matter what tactics Democrats employ because much of their base (white liberals and minorities) live in or around large cities.
Keeping compact communities in the same congressional district is often seen as preferable to splitting them up, so removing partisan bias from the<span style="color: Red;">*</span>process still would benefit Republicans, who tend to dominate in<span style="color: Red;">*</span>suburban and rural areas, Wasserman said.
“It’s an unfortunate turn of migration patterns for the Democratic Party,” he said. “Democrats can’t control where their voters choose to live. And yet, for a variety of reasons, Democrats are urbanizing as a party in a way that’s unhelpful to their legislative prospects.”
Follow<span style="color: Red;">*</span>@LedgeKing<span style="color: Red;">*</span>on Twitter.
Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed