Luke Skywalker
Super Moderator
{vb:raw ozzmodz_postquote}:
Sen. Patrick Leahy, who has supported Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign, now says he'll give his superdelegate vote to whichever candidate wins the majority of Democratic Party delegates. Here, Leahy arrives at a State Dinner in honor of Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau at the White House on March 10, 2016.(Photo: Chris Kleponis, AFP/Getty Images)
BURLINGTON, Vt.<span style="color: Red;">*</span>—<span style="color: Red;">*</span>A growing number of Vermonters are expressing outrage that four of the state’s most prominent Democratic Party superdelegates have committed to vote for Hillary Clinton rather than Bernie Sanders, despite Sanders’ overwhelming victory in Vermont’s primary.
By the end of last week, some 3,000 people had signed an open letter posted online by advocacy group Rights & Democracy that exhorted Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt.; Gov. Peter Shumlin; former governor<span style="color: Red;">*</span>and Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean; and party Committeewoman Billi Gosh to cast their superdelegate votes for “our fellow Vermonter Bernie Sanders,” to “honor democracy in action.”
James Haslam, executive director of Rights & Democracy, said a vote for Sanders is virtually dictated because the senator garnered 86.1% of the vote in the Vermont primary, receiving all 16 pledged delegates and “winning every single town in Vermont,” as confirmed by the Secretary of State’s Office.
“With this overwhelming and historic support, we request all Vermont superdelegates cast their votes for Senator Sanders,” the letter states. “While some superdelegates might have made a ‘promise’ in the past to other candidates, it would be irresponsible and undemocratic to ignore the Democratic primary results.”
At least four of Vermont’s superdelegates, including U.S. Rep. Peter Welch and Secretary of State Jim Condos, have said they will vote for Sanders. “The people of Vermont have spoken,” Condos said last month.
USA TODAY
Sanders to visit Vatican days before New York primary
Gosh rejects that perspective, saying Sanders’ win in the Vermont primary has no affect on her support for Clinton.
“Bernie is from Vermont, I’m a superdelegate from Vermont, this is getting a lot of attention, but for me nothing has changed,” said Gosh. “She’s way ahead of him in pledged delegates.”
Jerry Greenfield, co-founder of Ben & Jerry’s Ice Cream, signed the open letter and said the superdelegate debate is “really a matter of the democratic process.”
“The superdelegates in Vermont ought to be representing the will of Vermonters,” said Greenfield. “I’m saying that 86% of the people in Vermont voted for Sanders in the primary, and it just seems absurd to me that these so-called superdelegates don’t want to represent the view of Vermonters.”
Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., speaks in Essex Junction on Tuesday, March 1, 2016. With him, is his wife, Jane.<span style="color: Red;">*</span>(Photo: Glenn Russell, The Burlington (Vt.) Free Press)
Greenfield said he thinks the entire purpose of superdelegates is to “undermine the democratic process” by reasserting control by party elites.
“One thing this election cycle is showing is that the traditional party establishment doesn’t have the same control over the process as they used to,” Greenfield said.
History shows that superdelegates have done nothing to re-establish Democratic Party control over the election process. They have never tipped the balance from a candidate who won the majority of pledged delegates to a candidate who trailed in delegates.
‘I like Bernie Sanders’
The reference in the open letter to a “promise” to support other candidates applies to Sen. Leahy, who told the Burlington Free Press in February, before the New Hampshire primary, that he would be backing Clinton. He has made similar comments to multiple media outlets over many months.
“I won’t say anything against Bernie Sanders. I like him. I work very well with him,” Leahy said in an interview in Washington. “If he was the nominee, I would enthusiastically campaign for him. But I told him I gave my word to Hillary Clinton. I believe she’d make a great president, and I’ll keep my word.”
USA TODAY
Sanders, losing in delegates to Clinton, claims 'path to victory'
Leahy told the Free Press that casting his superdelegate vote for Clinton was a matter of “conscience and commitment,” adding he had a feeling “by the time the Democratic National Convention rolls around this summer, one of the candidates would have a clear majority of support.”
Leahy’s campaign manager, Carolyn Dwyer, sought to clarify Leahy’s position in response to the Rights & Democracy open letter. She wrote in an email that Leahy actually had not pledged his superdelegate vote.
“There has been some confusion on Senator Leahy’s position, which we have tried to correct,” Dwyer wrote. “Senator Leahy’s personal support is with Secretary Clinton. His delegate vote will go to the candidate with the most pledged delegates at the National Convention.”
When it was pointed out to Dwyer that Leahy was quoted saying it was a matter of “conscience and commitment” that he vote for Clinton, she responded in an email she understood the “confusion” surrounding the issue.
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton greets supporters as she arrives to speak at her Super Tuesday election night rally in Miami on March 1, 2016.<span style="color: Red;">*</span>(Photo: Gerald Herbert, AP)
“Senator Leahy was speaking of his personal support and keeping his word when he was talking about ‘conscience and commitment,’ but that wasn’t clear,” Dwyer wrote. “I have been asked by other reporters and they have not been provided with a direct quote about his delegate vote so I have to assume he simply wasn’t clear and it was left open to interpretation. We have tried to be clear in subsequent stories and ... comments as well as in our conversations with those contacting us on the issue.”
Scott Coriell, spokesman for Vermont's governor, wrote in an email that Shumlin will continue to support Hillary Clinton for president.
“She is currently leading in pledged delegates,” Coriell wrote. “To his knowledge, there has not been a scenario in recent history where superdelegates vote against the candidate who wins the most delegates and votes. He doesn’t expect that to change this year.”
Dean did not return a message seeking comment but has been vocal on Twitter about his unchanging support for Clinton and his belief that superdelegates are bound to follow their conscience.
USA TODAY
Bernie Sanders plots strategy to top Hillary Clinton in delegates
Through Friday, Clinton had 469 superdelegates to Sanders’ 31, according to a RealClearPolitics report. Clinton has 1,756 delegates to Sanders' 1,068.
“If you look at the numbers, there’s some huge primaries coming up, but so far she’s gotten 58% of the votes, 2.5 million more votes than Sanders,” Gosh said.
For Sanders to catch up, she said, he would have to win about 60% of the remaining votes in the primaries.
“That’s a pretty high bar for him to reach in terms of pledged delegates, so I’m sticking with her because she’s going to be the winner, and she’s superbly qualified,” Gosh said. “The country is ready for a woman president, and I think the fact we have this extremely capable and experienced woman running is the nexus we’ve been waiting for, for a long time.”
Insiders try to win back control
Bert Johnson, chairman of the political science department at Middlebury College, said it would be “very unusual” for superdelegates to go against the will of elected delegates at the national convention.
“If Sanders won the majority of elected delegates, I don’t think the superdelegates would stand in his way,” Johnson said.
Then why, one might ask, does the Democratic Party have superdelegates to begin with — especially since the Republican Party lacks them?
USA TODAY
How the Virgin Islands could decide the GOP presidential nomination
“We’ve had them since 1984,” Johnson said. “The goal was to bring party insiders back into the nomination process after they were excluded after 1968 election reforms. In the 1970s, primaries and open caucuses were elevated as a way to select delegates. The Democrats were upset the system produced (George) McGovern and (Jimmy) Carter, a couple of candidates outside the system.”
In Johnson’s opinion, superdelegates have failed to affect the election process in any meaningful way.
“I think it has not achieved what they were intending to achieve, which was to give control back to party elites,” he said. “They have not made the difference. Clearly in 2008, an outside candidate, Barack Obama, won the nomination.”
Democratic Party superdelegates Sen. Patrick Leahy, left, and former Vermont governor Howard Dean say their support in the 2016 presidential election lies with Hillary Clinton.<span style="color: Red;">*</span>(Photo: Glenn Russell, The Burlington (Vt.) Free Press)
Superdelegates persist, Johnson said, because it costs too much time and money to get rid of them by rewriting the rules.
“Like the Electoral College, superdelegates don’t make sense,” he said.
Haslam, the Rights & Democracy founder, agrees and said, “It strikes us as fundamentally undemocratic to have Vermont superdelegates support the candidate Vermonters are not supporting.”
Dean strongly disagrees, as he made clear on Twitter in debates with dozens of Sanders supporters. Last month, responding to a tweet that took him to task for failing to “represent the people,” Dean wrote, “Super delegates don’t ‘represent people.’ I’m not elected by anyone. I’ll do what I think is right for the country.”
Nevertheless, others around the country are asking their superdelegates to “follow the will of the people,” Haslam said.
“We’re not alone in holding our superdelegates accountable,” he said.
Follow Dan D’Ambrosio on Twitter:<span style="color: Red;">*</span>DanDambrosioVT
Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed