• OzzModz is no longer taking registrations. All registrations are being redirected to Snog's Site
    All addons and support is available there now.

Pentagon admits it has deployed military spy drones over the U.S.

Luke Skywalker

Super Moderator
{vb:raw ozzmodz_postquote}:
Get the news
Log In or Subscribe to skip

19 [h=6]Share This Story![/h]Let friends in your social network know what you are reading about

[h=4]Pentagon admits it has deployed military spy drones over the U.S.[/h]Pentagon inspector general says use of military spy drones in the U.S. is rare and done within the law

{# #}
[h=4]Sent![/h]A link has been sent to your friend's email address.



[h=4]Posted![/h]A link has been posted to your Facebook feed.



[h=6]Join the Nation's Conversation[/h]To find out more about Facebook commenting please read the Conversation Guidelines and FAQs






[h=2]UP NEXT[/h][h=2]03[/h]


The Pentagon has deployed drones to spy over U.S. territory for non-military missions over the past decade according to a new report. USA TODAY


A U.S. Air Force MQ-1B Predator unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), carrying a Hellfire air-to-surface missile lands at a secret air base in the Persian Gulf region on January 7, 2016. Such aircraft have been used over the U.S.(Photo: John Moore)


The Pentagon has deployed drones to spy over U.S. territory for non-military missions over the past decade, but the flights have been rare and lawful, according to a new report.
The report by a Pentagon inspector general, made public under<span style="color: Red;">*</span>a Freedom of Information Act request, said spy drones on<span style="color: Red;">*</span>non-military missions have occurred<span style="color: Red;">*</span>fewer than 20 times between 2006 and 2015 and always in compliance with existing<span style="color: Red;">*</span>law.
The report, which did not provide details on any of the domestic spying missions, <span style="color: Red;">*</span>said the Pentagon takes the issue of military drones used on American soil "very seriously."
A senior policy analyst for the ACLU, Jay Stanley, said it is good news no legal<span style="color: Red;">*</span>violations were found, yet the technology is so advanced<span style="color: Red;">*</span>that it's possible laws may require revision.
"Sometimes, new technology changes so rapidly that existing law no longer fit what people think are appropriate," Stanley said. "It's important to remember that the American people do find this to be a very, very sensitive topic."
The use of unmanned aerial surveillance (UAS) drones over U.S.<span style="color: Red;">*</span>surfaced in 2013 when then-FBI director Robert Mueller testified before Congress that the bureau employed spy drones to aid investigations, but in a "very,very minimal way, very seldom."
The inspector general analysis was completed<span style="color: Red;">*</span>March 20, 2015, but not released publicly until last Friday.
It said that<span style="color: Red;">*</span>with advancements in drone technology along with widespread military use overseas,<span style="color: Red;">*</span>the Pentagon established interim guidance<span style="color: Red;">*</span>in 2006 governing when and whether the unmanned aircraft could be used domestically. The interim policy allowed spy drones to be used for homeland defense purposes in the U.S. and to assist civil authorities.
But the policy said that any use of military drones for civil authorities had to be approved by the Secretary of Defense or someone delegated by the secretary. The report found that defense secretaries have never delegated that responsibility.
The report quoted<span style="color: Red;">*</span>a military law review article that said<span style="color: Red;">*</span>"the appetite to use them (spy drones)<span style="color: Red;">*</span>in the domestic environment to collect airborne imagery continues to grow, as does Congressional and media interest in their deployment."
Military units that operate drones told the inspector general they would like more opportunities to fly them on domestic missions if for no other reason than to give<span style="color: Red;">*</span>pilots more experience to improve their skills,<span style="color: Red;">*</span>the report said. "Multiple units told us that as forces using the UAS capabilities continue to draw down overseas, opportunities for UAS realistic training and use have decreased," the report said.
A request<span style="color: Red;">*</span>for all cases between 2006 and 2015 in which<span style="color: Red;">*</span>civil authorities asked the military for use of spy drones produced a list<span style="color: Red;">*</span>of "less than twenty events," <span style="color: Red;">*</span>the report said. The list included<span style="color: Red;">*</span>requests granted and denied.
The list was not made public in the<span style="color: Red;">*</span>report. But a few examples were cited, including one case in which<span style="color: Red;">*</span>an unnamed mayor asked the Marine Corps to use a drone to find potholes in the mayor's city. The Marines denied the request because obtaining the defense secretary's "approval to conduct a UAS mission of this type did not make operational sense."
Shortly before the inspector general report was completed a year ago, the Pentagon issued a new<span style="color: Red;">*</span>policy<span style="color: Red;">*</span>governing the use of spy drones. It requires the defense secretary to approve<span style="color: Red;">*</span>all domestic spy drone operations. It says that unless permitted by law and approved by the<span style="color: Red;">*</span>secretary, drones "may not conduct surveillance on U.S. persons." It also<span style="color: Red;">*</span>bans the use of armed drones over the United States for anything other training and testing.
0) { %> 0) { %>
0) { %>




Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed
 
Top